Run a Comp Intel Program Like an Award-Winning Klaviyo PMM

Let’s start with a situation I can pretty much guarantee you’ve lived through. You open Slack and there’s a message from a salesperson that says, “Hey, do we have a battle card for this competitor?” And you don’t. Because it’s the 50th competitor you’ve heard of this year, and you’re already drowning in requests.

If your competitive intelligence program feels like it’s failing, it’s not failing because you’re not working hard enough. It’s failing because the problem is infinite. Scale’s the real challenge. So today we’re talking about how to build the foundation of a competitive intelligence program that actually holds up. We’re looking at building a system that gives your company a real market point of view.

And I couldn’t think of a better person to guide us through this than Mindy Regnell.

Meet Mindy Regnell

Mindy’s an award-winning product marketer whose win-loss program won the 2025 Win-Loss Program of the Year from the Product Marketing Alliance. She’s spent nearly a decade deep in market and competitive intelligence, helping companies understand not just who they compete with, but why customers choose.

And fun fact, she’s also an award-winning quilter, with prizes from the Washington State Fair and the largest quilt show in Western Washington. Which honestly feels ridiculously on brand, because great competitive intelligence is basically pattern recognition at scale.

Competitive Intelligence at Klaviyo

Mindy runs market and competitive intelligence at Klaviyo, best known as a CRM for B2C businesses. She’s been there for about two years, and she brings a long view of the e-commerce landscape after nearly two decades in the space.

Her approach isn’t “build a battle card for every competitor that shows up.” It’s “build a framework that makes the chaos manageable.” Especially for regional sales teams who run into a rotating cast of competitors that never make it onto HQ’s radar.

The Long Tail Framework That Makes CI Scalable

Mindy’s framework was inspired by The Long Tail by Chris Anderson. The idea is simple. Back in the 90s, shelf space was limited, so you only worried about a small set of top options. Then Amazon and streaming changed the game. Suddenly the catalogue was endless, and the long tail mattered.

Competitive landscapes work the same way. You’ll always have tier-one competitors, but you’ll also have a long tail of niche tools, regional players, and random alternatives that show up mid-deal. If your CI program only covers the top three, it’s not a program. It’s a folder.

So Mindy built a way to categorise competitors into groups that actually mean something, so sales can respond quickly without needing a brand new asset every time.

Mindy’s Playbook: How to Build the Framework

Know yourself first

Before you map competitors, get crystal clear on what makes your company meaningfully different. This is what stops you treating every competitor like a full threat and helps you focus on where you truly win.

Cluster competitors by the real problem they solve

Mindy groups competitors based on root pain points and durable differences, not surface-level features that change every quarter. The goal is categories that stay useful over time.

Pressure test with the right people

She rolls the framework out to trusted teammates for feedback, and one of her best tips is to include people who are new. They’ll spot gaps faster because they aren’t trained on your internal assumptions yet.

Get leadership buy-in by making it about outcomes

Mindy positions the framework as a force multiplier, especially for regional sales teams who see the most “unusual suspects.” When leaders can see how it helps teams win, buy-in gets a lot easier.

Laying the Groundwork Without Creating a Content Factory

Mindy also shared a sequencing tip that’ll save your sanity. Build broad framework battle cards first, then go deep on your tier-one competitors. That way you’ve got coverage for the long tail without starting from scratch every time a new name pops up in a deal.

It’s the difference between “we’re always behind” and “we’ve got a system.”

Messaging Critique: Anthropic

To close out the episode, we shifted into the messaging critique, and looked at Anthropic’s recent Super Bowl ad. It’s competitive storytelling at its best, managing to make a statement without naming its main competitor, ChatGPT.

Instead of trying to win by being louder, the ad focused on clarity and simplicity. It took something complex and made it feel understandable, which is exactly what strong positioning does. It’s a reminder that you don’t always need a direct comparison to compete. Sometimes the smartest move is to define what “good” looks like, then let the market do the math.

If you’re building competitive intelligence, Mindy’s advice comes down to two things. Manage scope like your sanity depends on it, because it does. And position your work around stakeholder outcomes, not deliverables. When people can see how your CI program helps them win, it stops being “nice to have” and starts becoming infrastructure.

Big shout out to Mindy and the mentors who shaped her path. Her approach is a reminder that foundational PMM work is like leg day at the gym. Not always glamorous, but it’s what gives you long-term strength and stability.

LINKS:

Messaging Critique: Anthropic

Connect with Mindy:

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mindyregnell 


Connect with Elle:


LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/elle3izabeth/

Previous
Previous

Enable salespeolpe with AI like an Optiversal PMM

Next
Next

Reposition Your Platform Like an EventBrite PMM